Tuesday, August 20, 2019
Film: 2001 :: Papers
 Film: 2001          2001 is a masterpiece of cinema that still influences film makers     nearly thirty years after it was made -- but what does it actually     mean? Therein lies the enigma. Of course, 2001 is open to many     interpretations and probably even Kubrick couldn't provide the     "correct" one.       The film is very different from the book; Kubrick reduced the original     script to its bare essentials making the actors part of the narrative     , but not telling the narrative through the script. making it a lesser     part of the hole experience. Where there is speaking it is almost     always symbolic The first words spoken signal the decay of human     language to empty phrases: "Here you are, sir. Main level, please."       The opening of 2001 is the Dawn of Man sequence which dovetails neatly     with end of Dr. Strangelove: "We'll meet again, some sunny day "     First image in the film is of a rising Sun       Obviously, Kubrick pondered deeply the astonishing reality, that idea     that man was smart enough to blow up the earth, but not smart enough     to stop that from happening (kubric)(man doesn't want to nail himself,     but he does). How could such a phenomenon occur? With such strong     symbolic events and imagery in the opening seen it is hard to see them     all as individual events, kubric uses these to tell the narrative of     the story. The Sun is not just light, but heat (a desert). Making the     Sun not necessarily good, the Sun is usually seen as positive in     relation to dark, but not in a desert. This makes the sun a negative,     with the use of water as a positive. The leopard killing the zebra Is     a key element to the opening scene representing the behaviour of man     the Zebra is a coexistence of black and white? Good an bad together     just like man, making the leopard the destruction of man kind maybe     symbolising the bomb.       To echo the directors words ,QUOTE "you're free to speculate as you     wish about the philosophical and allegorical meaning of the film" but    					    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.